Vote now in wave 1 of the FEOTM Reboot!
slark said:Now that you guys have seen it - what's your favorite "wiseass comment" in "Fragments"?
ray zell said:Gotta say, I’m stunned. It is so TIGHT.
Tried to explain to my girlfrend, Holly, how well you’d need to know this film to really appreciate what you’ve done. Trust me, not one moment of it is wasted on me.
Strangely, one stand out moment, is how you dealt with Seas receiving the news of Savage being alive: "Borden." So SLICK.
And the fight on the yacht. It’s how I used to edit it in my mind.
I can actually watch this movie now – and relax. Just enjoy.
I could go on. And on. But… I think you get it.
My only fear now is, anythin’ ever goin’ wrong with the disc…
AAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRRGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!
Ripplin said:"how you dealt with Seas receiving the news of Savage being alive: "Borden." So SLICK."
Agreed. That worked out very well.
Ripplin said:It's funny you posted that now as I was just coming in to say that I'd like to make Doc and the boys as one of my Lego groups. I'd people to post pics of the group as they think they should look that I can use as a reference. I'm talking book versions, not movie ones, by the way.
Ripplin said:Someone rated it less than 10?! FOR SHAME!
Yup, yet for some reason Wolf Dancer is still the highlighted one on the top of the list (it had the top spot for a long time, it is now #4). I thought that would automatically update itself.slark said:"DETARNISHED!" has reached 10 votes, and with a 9.90 average, it presently stands at the top of The 50 Best-Rated True Fanedits list.
Did you send it to their home addresses or their agents? Stuff sent to agents is very likely to directly hit the trash can on arrival, unopened.slark said:I still have not heard from either Ron Ely or Pamela Hensley. :-( While I did not explicitly request a response from either, I kind of thought I'd hear something...
slark said:Yeah.
You know, I don't mind that it's not a "10". (Though it's closer to that than it is to a "9", IMO.) It's not perfect, and I never expected its overall rating to reflect otherwise. But the timing seemed to indicate that person who cast that 10th vote did so in a slimy way: It had stalled at 8 votes for a couple of weeks. Then, a 9th vote was cast on Sunday morning; it was a 10. (Yes, it was from someone I know - but it was an honest vote.) Then the 10th vote - a "9" - came in hot on its heels. Kind of smacked of someone hovering around to see what that 9th vote was going to be, then jumping right in when it wasn't less than a 10. Yeah, the timing could have been a coincidence. But then, so could an eBay sniping. ;-)
TV's Frink said:Are you seriously suspicious/complaining that someone gave the edit a 9?