Another reason Disney is a good fit. http://articles.latimes.com/2012/jun/01/business/la-fi-ct-disney-alan-horn-20120601
And then we have this article "Why It Doesn't Matter Who Directs The Next Star Wars Movie" http://www.cinemablend.com/new/Why-It-Doesn-t-Matter-Who-Directs-Next-Star-Wars-Movie-33853.html
So, coupled with the fact these screen treatments are a lot further along than we thought I can completely see Disney putting a relative nobody at the helm. I mean they have the Russo Brothers doing Captain America and Alan Taylor doing Thor. Within Disney "director" isn't synonymous with Auteur.
I do agree with everyone who says Brad Bird would be a perfect fit, and from a logistics standpoint, his schedule is pretty open (having only one movie in pre-production.) The real question is, 'who will they have come in and convert the treatments to scripts', an issue I think is almost more important than who directs.
The former Warner Bros. Entertainment president takes over as Walt Disney Studios chairman June 11, assuming control of the Burbank company. During his largely successful 12-year tenure at Warner Bros., Horn shepherded such critically acclaimed and lucrative films as the "Harry Potter," "Lord of the Rings" and revived "Batman" series, as well as "Charlie and the Chocolate Factory."
Disney's upcoming movies reflect the studio's reliance on familiar brands. In addition to "The Lone Ranger," next year's slate includes "Oz: The Great and Powerful," the live-action prequel to "The Wizard of Oz"; Marvel sequels "Iron Man 3" and "Thor 2"; and Pixar's "Monsters University," a prequel to the animation studio's "Monsters, Inc."
And then we have this article "Why It Doesn't Matter Who Directs The Next Star Wars Movie" http://www.cinemablend.com/new/Why-It-Doesn-t-Matter-Who-Directs-Next-Star-Wars-Movie-33853.html
The directors who have followed in Nolan's footsteps, mostly at Marvel, haven't pulled off quite the same game changes-- mostly because Marvel seems to put much tighter reins on its staff, happy to bring in brand-new directors for both the Thor and Captain America sequels, and to let go of Jon Favreau after two Iron Man films. Joss Whedon is clearly being established as Marvel's answer to Nolan, signing on for The Avengers 2 as well as creative consultant at the studio, similar to the way Nolan is shepherding the Superman movie Man of Steel at Warner Bros. The Avengers undeniably bore Whedon's stamp, with the quick-witted dialogue and the strong female characters, but it also adhered to a lot of the world-building that happened before he arrived-- The Avengers is Whedon's movie, but he's operating within a pretty strict set of guidelines laid out by Marvel Studios.
The fact that Disney now owns both Marvel and Lucasfilm suggests that they'll use similar tactic with the future of Star Wars, potentially hiring exciting new directors-- for a pittance compared to what top-flight talent would earn-- but making sure they operate within a clearly defined sandbox.
Which is all a way of saying: it probably doesn't matter that much who directs Star Wars: Episode VII. Yes, whoever gets the job will enjoy an unbelievable leap in their career prospects, and will be allowed to work with characters he or she (but, come on, it's gonna be a he) grew up playing with as action figures. The decisions about the aesthetic and the goals of this new Star Wars trilogy will be made well above the director, by Kathleen Kennedy and George Lucas and Bob Iger and Alan Horn and the focus groups who tell them they don't like it when R2D2 seems to have existential doubts. We may very well get a better and brighter new Star Wars trilogy out of all of this-- but your favorite director, no matter how awesome he is, won't be the one who's able to make that happen.
So, coupled with the fact these screen treatments are a lot further along than we thought I can completely see Disney putting a relative nobody at the helm. I mean they have the Russo Brothers doing Captain America and Alan Taylor doing Thor. Within Disney "director" isn't synonymous with Auteur.
I do agree with everyone who says Brad Bird would be a perfect fit, and from a logistics standpoint, his schedule is pretty open (having only one movie in pre-production.) The real question is, 'who will they have come in and convert the treatments to scripts', an issue I think is almost more important than who directs.