Mollo said:
Why are there are so many 360% shots? 1. buildings 2. faces 3. Morgan and Bales talking over a desk 4. The Joker threatening Rachel. 5. Alfred speaking wisdom.
Didn't notice that. But, I wouldn't say one too many 360 shots is grounds to undermine it's
(so called) status as a masterpiece.
Mollo said:
Why Batman's really gruff voice? Is this serious? Also why when dressed as Batman but talking to someone that knows it is Bruce Wayne does he still use this gruff voice?
That did bother me & what was so annoying about it is that it could of been so easily rectified with dubbing.
Mollo said:
Is the new Rachel beautiful? The Joker calls her beautiful not once but twice. Does that mean she is?
It didn't strike me as out of place when The Joker said it & this is the 1st time I've heard someone complain about that so I think it's a personal thing. Again this point isn't strong enough to undermine the film's status.
Mollo said:
Is Heath's performance so good? Heath does one thing remarkably well, he allow us to hear his tongue moving around inside his mouth with masticating brilliance.
Yes it is. Best villain since Hannible Lector.
Mollo said:
I didn't notice it being bad
(Like Quantum), so I suppose it was good. But, I've only seen the film once so it's kinda hard to remember.
Mollo said:
Was the musical score good?
I can't remember the score from either Nolan Batman Films so I would have to put them into the average catergories.
Mollo man have you seen the film yet? If so are these the things that bothered you about this film?
From my POV what undermines this films status as a masterpiece is that it sometimes struggles
(espcially towards the end) to find the balance between the realism it was obviously going for & the fantasy element that's inherit in the characters. ie, the bat mobile turning into a bike, the Sophie's Choice scenes & the Sonar.