The Making of SPLIT UNBREAKABLE GLASS
Sorry for the delay
Though the narrative is not revealed above, the colder you see the below, the better….
Split Unbreakable Glass - Fanedit.org
ifdb.fanedit.org
"THIS IS A PIECE OF ART!"
Read BEFORE posting Trades & Request
The Making of SPLIT UNBREAKABLE GLASS
Sorry for the delay
Though the narrative is not revealed above, the colder you see the below, the better….
Split Unbreakable Glass - Fanedit.org
ifdb.fanedit.org
Even tho the dining scene was significant in the theatrical cut, imho it can be left out completely as it doesn't add anything to the narrative. Plus, David's completely shaved face, straightly deeper voice(can you fix his voice lol), and uniform stand out like a sore thumb.REVISION 6.02 - DETAILS
Hi all...these are VERY minor, but necessary from my POV.....
I can't stress enough thou, these changes are barely noticeable and will certainly not prevent full enjoyment, but I HAVE to fix these.
Here are the changes:
- Flash frame removed after David and Joseph store chat
- Dr Fletcher's corpse removed when Casey is in the room frantic
- Improved the TRAIN JOURNEY crossfade between Glass and Unbreakable.
- Revised the FanEdit Logo (a revision to the version on DigModiFicaTion's Rise of the Rebellion thank you sir)
DETAILS:
Dr Fletcher's Corpse:
This was an oversight error, and I'm glad it was pointed out by BionicBob. The lazy thing would be to leave it. The next laziest thing is to remove the shot from the previously rendered, its quicker to far far quicker to re-render, but then a shot is lost and the image WILL start to introduce artifacts since it is in effect a third generation re-render (RIP/Render/Re-Render).
The proper thing to do is crop Dr Fletcher out of the shot and up-res the new shot and maintain the audio flow and run time. That is what I have done.
TRAIN WIPE:
The Train piece bothered me coz a shot on David changes color in an odd way before the wipe...I could not find out why. So now there are 3 wipes...
The Theatrical wipe,
The color grade wipe and
The pan back to the lady wipe....I think it is perfect now, or as close as can be.
So...rendering started again for v6.02
The Diner Scene NO CAN FIX
(music cue I wanted to fix) cannot be fixed.
The voice channel has too much music still despite a 5:1 surround rip and channel isolation, so for now, it remains. I even tried to rip the DVD, since I only need the audio and it could have had a better cleaner mix. It does not. Further, the encryption on the DVD (as in DRM) is worse than the Blu Ray. Took ages to sort that out. Alas, the voice track still has music, albeit a lot lower, it is too prominent to permit a clean overlay or replacement unless one of you can do better and drop me a clean center channel...for that scene only +60 sec either side?
I am going to try to subtract the music but creating an inverse waveform to cancel it out.... That will mean replicating the awful mix extension of that cue which made the theatrical version...I mean it is AWFUL....I tried overlaying the correct clen version I made, but it either made the music too loud or crushed the dialogue. Wave subtraction I believe is what YouTube does when it removes music but leaves a clip intact...go figure...Noise cancelling headphone do the same...so I'm going to give it a go...BUT.....
I will not delay the update further.
6.02 is rendering and I will let you all know when it is UP, so you can PM accordingly should you want to update.
There will be a 50 GB 5:1 UBER Size and High bit rate MP4, also 5:1
Ciao 4 Now
I have an IDEA? Just an idea, but I'm going to test it out....Even tho the dining scene was significant in the theatrical cut, imho it can be left out completely as it doesn't add anything to the narrative. Plus, David's completely shaved face, straightly deeper voice(can you fix his voice lol), and uniform stand out like a sore thumb.
LOL...wrong attribution anyway....Just kidding!
Now...THAT...is hilarious.LOL...wrong attribution anyway....
It was in the Novel Prisoner Of Zenda...I recall thinking when I read it many moons ago that it was very modern idiom for an old novel...I thought it was written by Alexandre Dumas....grabbed my copy to find the quote again, only to find it was written by Anthony Hope
SILLY ME