- Messages
- 8,760
- Reaction score
- 3,665
- Trophy Points
- 168
Read BEFORE posting Trades & Request
DigModiFicaTion said:
darthrush said:You can add me as a vote to keeping the last scene of Vader.
I like the idea of cutting him on Mustafar but am curious about your idea of still keeping his castle and the bacta tank shot. What would your rough idea of keeping it be?
TM2YC said:The Scribbling Man said:darksteel1335 said:So much care was taken with Vader. You’re really going to obliterate him from the film entirely?
"Entirely" seems exaggerated. There's the whole Vader slaughter at the end, isn't there? For me that was the best bit... I'm assuming that's being kept, but I might be wrong...
You are indeed wrong that'll likely be going too (although I'm less decided on that one, than on the awful and redundant scene with Krennic).
R1's Director gives a good reason why the scene should not be there at the start of this video...
(If Edwards had anything to do with the Vader/Krennic scene is unclear)
DigModiFicaTion said:Visually it looked great having the u-wing push the wipe along, but it seems odd to wipe to the same narrative storyline to me.
Zarius said:Having the ship move the wipe along is a really neat trick. Has it ever happened in any of the original films before?
TM2YC said:btw, I just noticed that in R1 Cassian angrily says "I've been in this fight since I was 6-years old!" to Jyn. Since Diego Luna was about 36-years old when R1 was shot, that means the Empire has been in control of the Galaxy for a minimum of 30-years. Was this Gareth Edwards crafty way to de-canonise the PT (if you consider them canon) and re-allign events with the sane OT timeline. Naturally, Wookieepedia has Cassian as 26-years old to make his character as old as possible, while still making the ludicrous PT timeline lineup with R1. Wow the Rebellion has sure aged Cassian! (Not as badly as Ben, Owen, Beru and Anakin).
Zarius said:Having the ship move the wipe along is a really neat trick. Has it ever happened in any of the original films before? I'm not too wipe-savy despite my love for them
DominicCobb said:This is a recurring problem in Star Wars. If you do the math, Luke is 53 in The Last Jedi, even though Mark Hamill was 65 when the film was shot.
TM2YC said:DominicCobb said:This is a recurring problem in Star Wars. If you do the math, Luke is 53 in The Last Jedi, even though Mark Hamill was 65 when the film was shot.
Are there specific dates/time-gaps mentioned in the ST, I forget?
DominicCobb said:In the films themselves? No, besides 0 time in between TFA and TLJ. But canon-wise, the ST is supposed to be 30 years after ROTJ. If you want to fudge the numbers in your mind I guess there's nothing stopping you there (or in ROTJ, for that matter, where Hamill is 31 playing 23).