theslime
Well-known member
- Messages
- 1,234
- Reaction score
- 2
- Trophy Points
- 41
REVIEW (contains massive spoilers)
This edit is - for the most part - a perfectly realised murder mystery whodunit edit chronicling the investigation of the murder of Laura Palmer. The problem is that Twin Peaks was never meant to be primarily a murder mystery whodunit chronicling the investigation of the murder of Laura Palmer. Now that this story (which was only a part of Twin Peaks) has a true beginning, a middle, and an end (a thing the original didn’t have and didn’t intend to have), it actually makes a lot of the problems of Twin Peaks more evident, as the sprawling nature of the serial storytelling used to hide the story flaws in the complexity and wonderful detours and non-essential elements. Is this the fault of the edit? No. But also: yes. I’ll try to explain.
I'll start with the praise: This edit tries to turn a soap opera into a film, and it succeeds admirably. Scenes are cut to preserve the sense of a focused cinematic story. The Ghostwood/Packards/Sawmill plot (a HUGE part of both seasons) is completely removed – and it doesn’t create one plothole as far as I can see. At some points, sentences are even cut in half, like when Lucy explains what happened last night to Cooper. You have to know the scene intimately to be able to tell that the scene used to be twice as long. This was a particular standout to me. Audrey is also almost completely removed from the film. While removing Audrey freakin’ Horne is obviously a deeply disappointing thing to have to do, she doesn’t really impact Laura’s story in any big way, so it’s necessary for this edit, and I applaud the kill-yer-darlings-cojones of the editor for this move.
While pretty much all the transitions work brilliantly from a technical standpoint, occasionally they fail at a storytelling level. The Harold sequence is the only sequence that seems truly rushed and barely makes sense as recut. Since Donna tries to steal the diary pretty much immediately, it creates a plothole when she later tells Harry that Harold read to her from the diary. It also makes no sense that Harold trusted a total stranger when the long sequence where he lets Donna into his life is missing. This is one of the parts where the recutting hurts the film.
A couple of times, though, transitions are wonky from a technical viewpoint. I'm thinking mainly of the occasional abrupt crossfading, a few music volume fluctuations (which could have been fixed through painstaking audio editing, although I imagine it would have been extremely hard), and some weird edits. I’m thinking mostly about the scene where the camera pans from Maddy to Hank Jennings, which cuts mid-pan, and the really weird scene where Audrey is about to open the door to the Sheriff’s conference room and Harry is there instead. Now, of course I only know it’s supposed to be Audrey because I’ve seen TP 10 times, but the transition is really weird either way. The weird full moon insert in the middle of the Diary Heist sequence is another example. There are limitations in the source material, sure, but these scenes take you out of the film. Could it be fixed? I don’t know. Probably some, probably not all. Did it annoy in the grand scheme of things? Not really, as they take up a minuscule amount of the 5 hour runtime.
Audio quality is stellar, apart from occasional weirdness mentioned. Video quality is mostly perfect, with the occasional washed-out skin tone in high-light scenes. I haven’t seen the itunes hd version this is based on, so I don’t know if it’s present there, but I would doubt it since I can’t remember it from the gold box dvd. More likely, it’s from the zooming/upsampling due to the reframing. The 16:9 reframing I was REALLY skeptical to, but it worked surprisingly well. The occasional missing head of hair from the top and missing hand at the bottom of the picture only occasionally annoys, like the “meanwhile” in the red room.
Now to the conclusion: Do I recommend this edit? Yes and no.
Yes because it does an extremely good job of restructuring the series into a film, and because it contains a lot of the best scenes of the series while being 5 instead of 25 hours long. No because it was never meant to BE a film, and the impact of the story suffers from the restructuring. An example: from late in the first season Audrey is at One-Eyed Jacks on a personal, risky stakeout. The One-Eyed Jacks sequence with Cooper and Big Ed in episode 7 of the series is a really tense sequence. Not because it’s particularly tense to begin with, but because we know what Cooper doesn't - namely that Audrey (who Cooper is also looking for) is in the same damned building! The scenes in the edit flow beautifully, but the edit is robbed of this tension. Also, in this edit, it’s necessary to go into the drug angle because Jacques is so necessary to the flow of the story. However, in the series we already know that Ben is the bank behind the drug operations, and Ben is ALSO at One-Eyed Jacks! In this edit, there’s only Ed and Cooper (and Jacques) – not the great confluence of crazy events that made Twin Peaks so unique.
But my main gripe with this story is with the ending. Not only does the excising of Dick Tremayne make a climactic event come out of the blue instead of being explained, but the actual ending is one of the cheapest and worst scenes of the series, in my opinion, and not worthy of being a Twin Peaks ending. On the show, this tremendous disappointment was softened by the fact that the episode contained a cliffhanger that opened up the door to this not being the end of Bob at all. A much better (open) ending was eventually provided, but this had to do with Cooper’s own past, not Laura’s. While the red room sequence as featured in the edit is expertly recut and re-inserted to provide some closure and background, it still feels weirdly out of place with the eventual ending. (Note of praise: cutting Windom Earle entirely from this worked really well, although the Coop doppelgänger is a bit of a head-scratcher without Hawk’s monologue.)
Another problem: after being told for a couple of episodes that this is a possession story, the extremely grisly murder scene of the series blurred the line between Bob and his “host” considerably. Fire Walk with Me went even further in this regard. The (really well done) editing of the murder scene and removal of all scenes up until the end that pointed out the killer, redraws the line between Bob and his host, making it more of an Exorcist-like possession story. This was, to me, never what Twin Peaks was about, and the “happy” ending of this edit ruins the complexity and makes the line clearly defined. This isn't the edit's fault per se. All the scenes are in the show. But the show, thankfully and interestingly, contradicted itself on more than one occasion making the story more complex. This was to the show's credit, imo, and I'm sad to see it more focused and streamlined - usually positive traits, not so in this case.
I'm also a bit unsure about how wise it was to cut so many Donna and James scenes. While there's obviously a lot of filler, A LOT of their scenes are investigative. The Harold sequence could have been longer (or maybe it could have been cut entirely?), and the Dr. Jacoby sequence (with Maddy and wig) would have worked in this edit too because it investigates the same thing Cooper investigates from a different angle (while the half-heart is mostly cut from this edit, it could still have had a place). Also, I love, love, LOVE "Just You (and I)" - generally considered an insane sentiment, I know - and would have loved to see it included, especially since Maddy subsequently seeing Bob doesn't have the same impact without it.
If you want a fresh Twin Peaks ride, I can recommend this. If you, like me, feel that Audrey and Major Briggs are as important as Laura Palmer, you might want to watch it anyway, but with a healthy dose of skepticism. If you, unlike me, loved the resolution of the Laura Palmer case on the show, then this edit is DEFINITELY for you.
It’s a credit to the tremendous quality of this edit that you can go into a rant about how you dislike how story points were handled. A bad edit doesn’t provide that opportunity. Try if this makes sense: I enjoyed every second of this edit, even the seconds I hated.
Scorecard:
Storytelling: 9/10 “objective” score (a few minor quibbles, including the fact that Harold’s story doesn’t really make sense, but the sheer kill-yer-darlings efficiency of what's cut and what's necessary and technical difficulty of some of the cuts make it a clear 9 all the same); 6/10 subjective score (I hate the ending)
Audio editing: 9/10 (occasional volume fluctuations)
Video editing: 9/10 (weird skintones in a couple of scenes)
Presentation: n/a (the AVCHD menu didn’t work for me, but that’s probably I played it from hard drive or because I don’t have proper proprietary bluray drivers installed on my computer; I don’t care about menus anyway; the chapters worked, though)
Total: 9/10
This edit is - for the most part - a perfectly realised murder mystery whodunit edit chronicling the investigation of the murder of Laura Palmer. The problem is that Twin Peaks was never meant to be primarily a murder mystery whodunit chronicling the investigation of the murder of Laura Palmer. Now that this story (which was only a part of Twin Peaks) has a true beginning, a middle, and an end (a thing the original didn’t have and didn’t intend to have), it actually makes a lot of the problems of Twin Peaks more evident, as the sprawling nature of the serial storytelling used to hide the story flaws in the complexity and wonderful detours and non-essential elements. Is this the fault of the edit? No. But also: yes. I’ll try to explain.
I'll start with the praise: This edit tries to turn a soap opera into a film, and it succeeds admirably. Scenes are cut to preserve the sense of a focused cinematic story. The Ghostwood/Packards/Sawmill plot (a HUGE part of both seasons) is completely removed – and it doesn’t create one plothole as far as I can see. At some points, sentences are even cut in half, like when Lucy explains what happened last night to Cooper. You have to know the scene intimately to be able to tell that the scene used to be twice as long. This was a particular standout to me. Audrey is also almost completely removed from the film. While removing Audrey freakin’ Horne is obviously a deeply disappointing thing to have to do, she doesn’t really impact Laura’s story in any big way, so it’s necessary for this edit, and I applaud the kill-yer-darlings-cojones of the editor for this move.
While pretty much all the transitions work brilliantly from a technical standpoint, occasionally they fail at a storytelling level. The Harold sequence is the only sequence that seems truly rushed and barely makes sense as recut. Since Donna tries to steal the diary pretty much immediately, it creates a plothole when she later tells Harry that Harold read to her from the diary. It also makes no sense that Harold trusted a total stranger when the long sequence where he lets Donna into his life is missing. This is one of the parts where the recutting hurts the film.
A couple of times, though, transitions are wonky from a technical viewpoint. I'm thinking mainly of the occasional abrupt crossfading, a few music volume fluctuations (which could have been fixed through painstaking audio editing, although I imagine it would have been extremely hard), and some weird edits. I’m thinking mostly about the scene where the camera pans from Maddy to Hank Jennings, which cuts mid-pan, and the really weird scene where Audrey is about to open the door to the Sheriff’s conference room and Harry is there instead. Now, of course I only know it’s supposed to be Audrey because I’ve seen TP 10 times, but the transition is really weird either way. The weird full moon insert in the middle of the Diary Heist sequence is another example. There are limitations in the source material, sure, but these scenes take you out of the film. Could it be fixed? I don’t know. Probably some, probably not all. Did it annoy in the grand scheme of things? Not really, as they take up a minuscule amount of the 5 hour runtime.
Audio quality is stellar, apart from occasional weirdness mentioned. Video quality is mostly perfect, with the occasional washed-out skin tone in high-light scenes. I haven’t seen the itunes hd version this is based on, so I don’t know if it’s present there, but I would doubt it since I can’t remember it from the gold box dvd. More likely, it’s from the zooming/upsampling due to the reframing. The 16:9 reframing I was REALLY skeptical to, but it worked surprisingly well. The occasional missing head of hair from the top and missing hand at the bottom of the picture only occasionally annoys, like the “meanwhile” in the red room.
Now to the conclusion: Do I recommend this edit? Yes and no.
Yes because it does an extremely good job of restructuring the series into a film, and because it contains a lot of the best scenes of the series while being 5 instead of 25 hours long. No because it was never meant to BE a film, and the impact of the story suffers from the restructuring. An example: from late in the first season Audrey is at One-Eyed Jacks on a personal, risky stakeout. The One-Eyed Jacks sequence with Cooper and Big Ed in episode 7 of the series is a really tense sequence. Not because it’s particularly tense to begin with, but because we know what Cooper doesn't - namely that Audrey (who Cooper is also looking for) is in the same damned building! The scenes in the edit flow beautifully, but the edit is robbed of this tension. Also, in this edit, it’s necessary to go into the drug angle because Jacques is so necessary to the flow of the story. However, in the series we already know that Ben is the bank behind the drug operations, and Ben is ALSO at One-Eyed Jacks! In this edit, there’s only Ed and Cooper (and Jacques) – not the great confluence of crazy events that made Twin Peaks so unique.
But my main gripe with this story is with the ending. Not only does the excising of Dick Tremayne make a climactic event come out of the blue instead of being explained, but the actual ending is one of the cheapest and worst scenes of the series, in my opinion, and not worthy of being a Twin Peaks ending. On the show, this tremendous disappointment was softened by the fact that the episode contained a cliffhanger that opened up the door to this not being the end of Bob at all. A much better (open) ending was eventually provided, but this had to do with Cooper’s own past, not Laura’s. While the red room sequence as featured in the edit is expertly recut and re-inserted to provide some closure and background, it still feels weirdly out of place with the eventual ending. (Note of praise: cutting Windom Earle entirely from this worked really well, although the Coop doppelgänger is a bit of a head-scratcher without Hawk’s monologue.)
Another problem: after being told for a couple of episodes that this is a possession story, the extremely grisly murder scene of the series blurred the line between Bob and his “host” considerably. Fire Walk with Me went even further in this regard. The (really well done) editing of the murder scene and removal of all scenes up until the end that pointed out the killer, redraws the line between Bob and his host, making it more of an Exorcist-like possession story. This was, to me, never what Twin Peaks was about, and the “happy” ending of this edit ruins the complexity and makes the line clearly defined. This isn't the edit's fault per se. All the scenes are in the show. But the show, thankfully and interestingly, contradicted itself on more than one occasion making the story more complex. This was to the show's credit, imo, and I'm sad to see it more focused and streamlined - usually positive traits, not so in this case.
I'm also a bit unsure about how wise it was to cut so many Donna and James scenes. While there's obviously a lot of filler, A LOT of their scenes are investigative. The Harold sequence could have been longer (or maybe it could have been cut entirely?), and the Dr. Jacoby sequence (with Maddy and wig) would have worked in this edit too because it investigates the same thing Cooper investigates from a different angle (while the half-heart is mostly cut from this edit, it could still have had a place). Also, I love, love, LOVE "Just You (and I)" - generally considered an insane sentiment, I know - and would have loved to see it included, especially since Maddy subsequently seeing Bob doesn't have the same impact without it.
If you want a fresh Twin Peaks ride, I can recommend this. If you, like me, feel that Audrey and Major Briggs are as important as Laura Palmer, you might want to watch it anyway, but with a healthy dose of skepticism. If you, unlike me, loved the resolution of the Laura Palmer case on the show, then this edit is DEFINITELY for you.
It’s a credit to the tremendous quality of this edit that you can go into a rant about how you dislike how story points were handled. A bad edit doesn’t provide that opportunity. Try if this makes sense: I enjoyed every second of this edit, even the seconds I hated.
Scorecard:
Storytelling: 9/10 “objective” score (a few minor quibbles, including the fact that Harold’s story doesn’t really make sense, but the sheer kill-yer-darlings efficiency of what's cut and what's necessary and technical difficulty of some of the cuts make it a clear 9 all the same); 6/10 subjective score (I hate the ending)
Audio editing: 9/10 (occasional volume fluctuations)
Video editing: 9/10 (weird skintones in a couple of scenes)
Presentation: n/a (the AVCHD menu didn’t work for me, but that’s probably I played it from hard drive or because I don’t have proper proprietary bluray drivers installed on my computer; I don’t care about menus anyway; the chapters worked, though)
Total: 9/10
