Read BEFORE posting Trades & Request
Q2 said:I haven't watched this edit but I am curious about the pan and scan comment. Unless I'm mistaken, this is an edit of the original IT from 1990, correct? That version was made for television and had an aspect ratio of 4:3, so why would pan and scan need to be used here? Just curious is all.
Wow. Thank you so much. I'm glad the time I put into this comes through. I really feel that there is a quite a good movie thinly veiled behind some cheesy writing and poor effects here & there.thecuddlyninja said:This one was a pleasure to review. Absolutely great work taking a miniseries that feels very dated (I just watched it a few months ago) and updating it as much as possible without feeling anachronistic. Particularly good job with the rescoring, the new music choices worked very well. Sometimes subtle and sometimes very overt, the selection was pretty impeccable in my opinion. There's no way to restructure and reorder as much as you did without using a lot of transitions but this is a situation where the crossfades didn't feel overused because the source material utilized it so much. It also seems of the era in a good way rather than "overly fanedited" if that makes sense. I think this piece works so much better intercut, and you made some really smart choices to use flashbacks from the first part to inform character in scenes from the second part. The original falls a bit flat for me because I care a lot more about the first part than I do the second and this makes them work together.
Some highlights of use of the new score:
- The group hug
- When the kids enter the sewer
- Stan running through the tunnels
- The adult dinner scene
- The flashback to when Stan sees It
- The library scene when It goes full poltergeist on the adults
I've extended the crossfade as far as the clips will allow without existing cuts popping into the fade. Hopefully this does the trick.thecuddlyninja said:38:58 I think it needs a longer crossfade here to match earlier fades between the two timelines
I've slowed it from 35% to 30%. This increases the overall duration from 1s37ms to 1s55msthecuddlyninja said:1:02:58 Stretch out the sound effect (which is really good) a little bit longer since we're jumping between timelines
This is a limit of the source material, but I took your suggestion and tightened the scene a smidge to have the organ start piping in before the cut.thecuddlyninja said:1:13:39 You should start the organ music in the scene before (audio leads the viewer into a hard cut) because it seems abrupt coming in right after the cut
Extended the audio across the cut.thecuddlyninja said:1:14:40 Abrupt audio cut as the music drops out, even though it's supposed to be no break in time
This is another limit of the source material. I didn't change the dialog in this part at all. But, like the Odometer in the DeLorean, once you see it, it cannot be unseen. Haha. I grabbed a few frames from another part of the scene where he isn't moving his mouth and tracked it over top of the existing footage with a highly feathered mask. I think this came out pretty well.thecuddlyninja said:1:17:18 Audio not synced right (or missing a bit). I think (and looking at his mouth) Beverly's dad says "What're you doing down here with these boys, BEVY" but the "Bevy" part is not on the audio track at all, so his mouth moves but we don't hear it.
This is another limitation of the source (Sinbad also noticed this) so I double-checked my source as well as a DVD version I.. tracked down for comparison. So I've SLOWED the shot of the back of Bev's head after the jerky pan is complete and then stabilized that material. I think it came out pretty well TBH. Perhaps you agree?thecuddlyninja said:1:34:37 - Pan down is a little jittery - frames dropped? Or slowed down artificially?
This is a combination of the original -- inextricable -- score and the new cue. I have reduced the volume of the new cue considerably, let me know if I've gone overboard, but I think they work well together (which is why I layered them in the first place) so dropping the new one doesn't stick out at all to my ears.thecuddlyninja said:1:51:52 In the Stan flashback either the music needs to come down or the vocal track needs to come up but the music drowns out parts of the VO
Extended cue to fade out more gradually.thecuddlyninja said:2:05:38 Music drops out a bit too suddenly
Switched the close-up of Bed & Ben with the one of Eddie.thecuddlyninja said:2:17:31 The position of Eddie's head doesn't match from one cut to the next. I would recommend inserting a closeup of someone else in between the two so you don't have to lose the Eddie closeup (I really like that performance)
I don't think the kiss actually adds anything to the story. If it weren't for the discovery that Ben wrote the poem, I'd cut this whole sequence. That "why is it so mean" monologue really doesn't do it for me. But, alas, it is what it is. I already trimmed it *way* back because it really did seem to be a bit much for the circumstances. But then, it's also a 30-year payoff. Anyway, I removed the actual kissy-kissy, but not the moment.thecuddlyninja said:Lastly, a recommendation that you don't have to take for approval but is just a suggestion. I would definitely cut the Ben/Beverly kiss at 2:12:30. It stands out as so bizarre to me that they share this conversation and moment while Mike is literally dying and they are waiting to hear his fate. Movies do this all the time but this is one of the most off-putting to me.
Conrad MacIntyre said:I've extended the crossfade as far as the clips will allow without existing cuts popping into the fade. Hopefully this does the trick.thecuddlyninja said:38:58 I think it needs a longer crossfade here to match earlier fades between the two timelines
Conrad MacIntyre said:I've slowed it from 35% to 30%. This increases the overall duration from 1s37ms to 1s55msthecuddlyninja said:1:02:58 Stretch out the sound effect (which is really good) a little bit longer since we're jumping between timelines
Nice, sounds good.Conrad MacIntyre said:This is a limit of the source material, but I took your suggestion and tightened the scene a smidge to have the organ start piping in before the cut.thecuddlyninja said:1:13:39 You should start the organ music in the scene before (audio leads the viewer into a hard cut) because it seems abrupt coming in right after the cut
Conrad MacIntyre said:Extended the audio across the cut.thecuddlyninja said:1:14:40 Abrupt audio cut as the music drops out, even though it's supposed to be no break in time
Conrad MacIntyre said:This is another limit of the source material. I didn't change the dialog in this part at all. But, like the Odometer in the DeLorean, once you see it, it cannot be unseen. Haha. I grabbed a few frames from another part of the scene where he isn't moving his mouth and tracked it over top of the existing footage with a highly feathered mask. I think this came out pretty well.thecuddlyninja said:1:17:18 Audio not synced right (or missing a bit). I think (and looking at his mouth) Beverly's dad says "What're you doing down here with these boys, BEVY" but the "Bevy" part is not on the audio track at all, so his mouth moves but we don't hear it.
Conrad MacIntyre said:This is another limitation of the source (Sinbad also noticed this) so I double-checked my source as well as a DVD version I.. tracked down for comparison. So I've SLOWED the shot of the back of Bev's head after the jerky pan is complete and then stabilized that material. I think it came out pretty well TBH. Perhaps you agree?thecuddlyninja said:1:34:37 - Pan down is a little jittery - frames dropped? Or slowed down artificially?
Conrad MacIntyre said:This is a combination of the original -- inextricable -- score and the new cue. I have reduced the volume of the new cue considerably, let me know if I've gone overboard, but I think they work well together (which is why I layered them in the first place) so dropping the new one doesn't stick out at all to my ears.thecuddlyninja said:1:51:52 In the Stan flashback either the music needs to come down or the vocal track needs to come up but the music drowns out parts of the VO
Conrad MacIntyre said:Extended cue to fade out more gradually.thecuddlyninja said:2:05:38 Music drops out a bit too suddenly
Conrad MacIntyre said:Switched the close-up of Bed & Ben with the one of Eddie.thecuddlyninja said:2:17:31 The position of Eddie's head doesn't match from one cut to the next. I would recommend inserting a closeup of someone else in between the two so you don't have to lose the Eddie closeup (I really like that performance)
Conrad MacIntyre said:I don't think the kiss actually adds anything to the story. If it weren't for the discovery that Ben wrote the poem, I'd cut this whole sequence. That "why is it so mean" monologue really doesn't do it for me. But, alas, it is what it is. I already trimmed it *way* back because it really did seem to be a bit much for the circumstances. But then, it's also a 30-year payoff. Anyway, I removed the actual kissy-kissy, but not the moment.thecuddlyninja said:Lastly, a recommendation that you don't have to take for approval but is just a suggestion. I would definitely cut the Ben/Beverly kiss at 2:12:30. It stands out as so bizarre to me that they share this conversation and moment while Mike is literally dying and they are waiting to hear his fate. Movies do this all the time but this is one of the most off-putting to me.