theslime
Well-known member
- Messages
- 1,234
- Reaction score
- 2
- Trophy Points
- 41
dangermouse said:Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy. A "mystery" which is obscured by bad storytelling and boring characters. Show men walking, walking, walking. Close up to meaningful stare. Hard cut to a page being signed. 20 second close up of the pen. Men shouting suddenly with seemingly no motivation. Men walking. etc. Flashback. Men walking. Flashback - but don't tell the audience, have tiny clues it's a flashback. Character motivations are hinted at, but never explained or fully revealed. Unfortunately a 2 hour movie is not a novel, and the filmmakers didn't understand that.
Oh, and I pegged the mole in the first 15 minutes of the movie. It's not complicated, because for all their attention to detail, the filmmakers were lazy.
I know they were going for "confusion" so that we could feel the sense of confusion and "fog" that the spies feel, but in my opinion it fell completely flat. Rather show us the character's confusion, than make us confused!
Thank you. I agree so much it hurts. I've never wanted to like a movie more than I wanted to like this (big fan of pretty much all the actors AND the director, and it looked amazing), but I lost faith about halfway through. There's no flow to it whatsoever. It follows every impressionist whim it gets, while packing too much plot into its runtime (a common flaw of adaptations of crime and spy stories). Since everything is plot and mood, the characters are completely forgotten about. When it stayed with a character for an extended period (like with the Tom Hardy character) it worked. Sadly, that was only about 15 minutes of the film.
I actually like impressionistic, directionless art films that look great. Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy is the big exception.