• Most new users don't bother reading our rules. Here's the one that is ignored almost immediately upon signup: DO NOT ASK FOR FANEDIT LINKS PUBLICLY. First, read the FAQ. Seriously. What you want is there. You can also send a message to the editor. If that doesn't work THEN post in the Trade & Request forum. Anywhere else and it will be deleted and an infraction will be issued.
  • If this is your first time here please read our FAQ and Rules pages. They have some useful information that will get us all off on the right foot, especially our Own the Source rule. If you do not understand any of these rules send a private message to one of our staff for further details.
  • Please read our Rules & Guidelines

    Read BEFORE posting Trades & Request

Red Dwarf: Canaries (a Red Dwarf VIII feature edit)

Use Bitchute if you have to... I've been using it as an alternative myself. Others just stick it on Dropbox.
 
I'm saying nothing.

Actually, I will say that I probably won't follow up on the next three edits in this thread as while they're sequential they're still independent edits (unless the mods see it differently?) but I thought I might as well drop a teaser of what to expect as I've just got started on the next two. So, there is it! Expect the proper threads soon.

whiteandred-00370400.png
 
I've decided on reflection that I'm going to go back over this. Functionally it'll still be the same edit because I don't really think there's a lot else needs doing aside from maybe fixing up some effects shots, but I made this edit on an editing suite I didn't fully know how to use at the time and the visual quality isn't as good as it could've been as a result. I can't just leave it like that.

In other news, I've made some progress on the next edit in the series. Check that out here: https://forums.fanedit.org/threads/red-dwarf-size-matters-a-red-dwarf-vii-viii-feature-edit.28782/
 
It does slightly irk me that a fanedit I had to put in some work and make changes to meet approval for then just disappears into the ether, but then I'm just allowed to self-publish something that hadn't been properly peer-reviewed (and in retrospect would have benefitted massively from that, because in my opinion it wasn't really ready to go out and I was a bit too hasty in submitting it in the excitement, though in my defence I wasn't expecting it to be approved so quickly), and it concerns me a bit that this might be standard procedure in less visible cases where less scrutiny is applied.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom