Muffy said:
Lol my bad know you more as LS then Last Survivor
, Last of The Lone Survivors ;-)
Checked out your last Vid Diary so your going with 70's disaster movies for your next project, should prove interesting.
That's all cool Muffy... certainly made me laugh anyways. I might start a line of "nasty" fanedits from Lone Survivor
I hope the 70's disaster theme will prove popular - we'll see... long way to go yet.
Neglify said:
The length and timing of the episodes felt odd. I think it could have been better spread across three 22 minute episodes (that’s US standard, I don’t know about the UK so I could be being totally arrogant here bout this). That way each “season” has a beginning, middle and end. (We’ll see how this plays out as I continue to watch.) Also, and this is definitely a personal opinion, the TV vibe kind of went out the window with all the F-bombs. I know it would have been really tricky to cut some of those and I guess I’m fine with the idea that the LS Network allows multiple F words, but you know, we gotta think about the children.
Firstly, Neg thanks for going above and beyond the call of duty in reviewing each 2 episodes, you crazy dude
Interesting point about the timing, as I purposely chose each episode to be about 40 minutes in length, as to me that's kind of the average length of a US show (or 50 minutes in the old days) minus the adverts. As for the F-words, I never for one minute entertained taking the edit as far down the TV series track as to censor it. For me, LS Network broke new ground and gave us hardcore shows. Just wait 'till you the see the uncut episodes of Knight Rider my friend
Neglify said:
The picture-in-picture effects before a “commercial break” felt out of place, they were too slick and digital. And at one point in Episode 1 there was a distracting flash frame or some sort of jump cut transition, it was like a frame was missing right before the cut. Like I said, I’m nitpicking.
The picture-in-picture effect is a direct homage to Knight Rider, as they had the same style of effect when they went to advert break. They are a bit hokey I agree, but I never thought of them as too slick. he he. As for the flash frame, you're absolutely right. Gatos rightly pointed this out in his review, and it was a single frame which unfortuately had missed my "reframing" efforts, so the picture suddenly moves. My bad, but neither I, nor Sophie or my friend noticed it when we watched it... doh!
Neglify said:
And I will watch all these episodes again with commentary... sometime in the future. I think I’ll do an LS commentary marathon one of these days.
You're a brave man Neg. Hopefully you'll enjoy these ones. They're definitely the best sounding commentaries as I had use of a very nice condensor mic this time around
Neglify said:
I didn’t miss Chuck Norris did I?
nope, you didn't. He's only prominently featured in Eps 1 and 2 I'm afraid.
Neglify said:
Editing was solid. A lot of great attention to detail, really slick overall. Couple nitpicks though. Maybe it’s because I know your tricks but some of the audio replacement was more noticeable than previous edits. I really only noticed it a couple times and I’m sure there are instances I missed because they were so seamless.
Now this is interesting, in that you picked up the audio replacement in episodes 1 and 2. There isn't a great deal of it if truth be told, apart from the lengthy flashback at the beginning of Episode 2 (including the ADR work by Sophie). In fact, I thought Eps 3 and 4 were the most troublesome episodes in terms of audio editing. Was very tough, and I'm not 100% happy with it (particularly with a few music transitions), but it was as good as I could get it.
Anyways Neg, thanks so much for taking the time to write episode specific reviews. As always, your thoughts are always honest, constructive and entertaining
Look forward to your thoughts on the next 4 episodes.