• Most new users don't bother reading our rules. Here's the one that is ignored almost immediately upon signup: DO NOT ASK FOR FANEDIT LINKS PUBLICLY. First, read the FAQ. Seriously. What you want is there. You can also send a message to the editor. If that doesn't work THEN post in the Trade & Request forum. Anywhere else and it will be deleted and an infraction will be issued.
  • If this is your first time here please read our FAQ and Rules pages. They have some useful information that will get us all off on the right foot, especially our Own the Source rule. If you do not understand any of these rules send a private message to one of our staff for further details.
  • Please read our Rules & Guidelines

    Vote NOW for January FEOTM!

Killing A Chinese Bookie

Gatos

Well-known member
Faneditor
Messages
3,467
Reaction score
1
Trophy Points
46
LastSurvivor said:
Interesting :) There's me thinking you would suggest watching the 76 cut first!! lol. I'm glad I asked. Will let you know how I get on.

When I bought the DVDs i watched the 78 cut first, based on imdb, rottentomatoes and amazon reviews. Its definitely interesting to see what Cassavettes changed in the 78 cut compared to the 76 cut. The 76 release of the film was a huge failure, I think it lasted something like 2 weeks. Then it was pulled from theaters. Cassavettes reworked it. (There is some audio interview clips in the special features of Cassavettes discussing the film, and i thought it was prety interesting). He then released a new version in 78. And that version is not just a trimmed down cut of the original, he changes around the order of scenes, replaces scenes, add scenes etc. To me they are two separate movies and there is a very interesting article online that analyzes the two movies and really shows that the storyline and the image of the main character actually end up being very different in each version.

Anyway, I am looking forward to hearing what you thought of the edit.
 

LastSurvivor

Well-known member
Donor
Faneditor
Messages
1,844
Reaction score
429
Trophy Points
113
Okay, the below review is also on the main page... Thanks Gatos... great work :) .....

One of the greatest things about fanediting, or at least "watching" a fanedit, is that occasionally you uncover a movie which you've never even heard of before. Such was the case when I started to keep track of the progress for Gatos' first fanedit, entitled Killing a Chinese Bookie.

To my shame I don't really know Nick Cassavetes' work. Sure I had heard of him as an actor (and remember with great fondness the image of him being blown to pieces by Amy Irving in Brian De Palma's The Fury), but as director? Nope, sorry, that bus must have passed me by. However, the first trailer which I saw from Gatos immediately got me interested and I eventually made the effort to buy the Criterion DVD to watch the original 1978 version.

I had been warned that Cassavetes is not the most conventional of film makers, but if anything this just heightened my interest and sure enough having sat through 108 minutes following a few days in the life of strip-club owner Cosmo Vitelli, a self possessing but well meaning man who gets involved in owing a rather large sum of money to some not so friendly gangster types, I smiled the kind of smile which you get after watching those rarest of cinematic gems - a truly unique movie. I loved Cassavetes style - from his long takes and restrained editing style to his quite superb use of the handheld camera - it just drew me into Cosmo's world effortlessly. I then worried about what Gatos could do as a fanedit, such was the personal feeling which Cassavetes had given the movie. Well, a mixture of worry and excitement at any rate :)

Reading Gatos' reasons for this fanedit, to make this a faster moving and more traditional gangster movie, it did initially take me some convincing that this would work. The fact I watched it on the same day as Cassavetes original version also meant I would be scrutinizing the changes perhaps more than I would normally. However, as some of the changes began to take shape in the first half of Gatos' 78 minute edit, I relaxed and realised this was going to work just fine.

First things first, the techincal stuff....

PICTURE: The quality was excellent, basically the same as the Criterion DVD. It has that lovely 1970's film stock look (how I wish we could go backwards sometimes) and I never really noticed any glaring differences. There's certainly no interlacing or anything like that. 9/10

AUDIO: Nice work again. No harsh cuts, drop outs or varying volume levels. 10/10

EDITING: This is the crux of the piece of course. For a firstling Gatos handles his choices superbly well. They all work in the context of the story he wants the movie to convey and the only slight gripe would be, as Rouge-theX pointed out, the somewhat ill-fitting and abrupt fade out/in during one scene. As there are no other fade outs in the movie (I think!), it just doesn't seem to work and the fact that it is quite abrupt doesn't help. However, that aside, the editing choices and execution of them were excellent. Well done Gatos. 9/10

ENTERTAINMENT: Big kudos here, as against the odds Gatos' edit manages to maintain the personality of Cassavetes' original version, despite the fact that 30 minutes is cut from the movie. It's quite extraordinary that despite all the cutting of the strip-club routines (most of them at any rate), scenes which helped shape Cosmo's world I might add, the sense of character and realism within the piece is still retained at a pretty high level. True, it is certainly more of a traditional style gangster movie, but Gatos manages to leave enough to allow Ben Gazzara's charismatic, yet naturalistic performance, to shine through in almost the same way it did in the original.
All in all this is a hugely impressive fanedit. It certainly won't replace Cassavetes' original for me, but as a more accessible version it works wonderfully well and certainly deserves to be seen. On the proof of this, I look forward to "OZ", Gatos next project, with eager anticipation.

Overall, I would score this 9/10.
 

Gatos

Well-known member
Faneditor
Messages
3,467
Reaction score
1
Trophy Points
46
Thanks for the detailed review LastSurvivor. I really appreciate it! And I'm glad my fanedit got you to watch a new movie you hadn't heard of and might have not seen otherwise. Drop me a line if/when you decide to be bold and watch the 1976 cut of the film.

And just for my own edification, in case I ever end up tinkering with my fanedit (and I probably should have asked Rogue-theX the same thing) but the abrupt fade out/fade in you are referring to, is this when Cosmo is picking up the girls in the limo and there is the transition to Rachel smoking in the bathroom? The only other scene I can think of besides this which may have been abrupt or stood out was when Cosmo is dropped off at the club after the night at the casino and then there is the fade and then its night and the gangsters drive up to the front of the club.

Anyway, thanks again for the review as well as the constructive feedback. It is greatly appreciated!
 

Gatos

Well-known member
Faneditor
Messages
3,467
Reaction score
1
Trophy Points
46
So just a quick message for the rare one or two who might be interested in this edit. I just finished reupping this to Mediafire. I'm sure the info page will be updated eventually but if you want the links you can PM me.
 

LastSurvivor

Well-known member
Donor
Faneditor
Messages
1,844
Reaction score
429
Trophy Points
113
Good news Gatos... It's well worth anyone's time - excellent first edit of yours :)
 

Gatos

Well-known member
Faneditor
Messages
3,467
Reaction score
1
Trophy Points
46
LastSurvivor said:
Good news Gatos... It's well worth anyone's time - excellent first edit of yours :)

Thanks LS.
 

Gatos

Well-known member
Faneditor
Messages
3,467
Reaction score
1
Trophy Points
46
Thanks for the review [MENTION=17386]Vultural[/MENTION]!
 
Top Bottom