Nic
Well-known member
- Messages
- 1,707
- Reaction score
- 116
- Trophy Points
- 68
Well, this movie is...unique. This certainly is not a bad film, it's very well made and nicely acted, but it isn't Nolan's best (the only movies of his I've not seen are Following, Memento, and Insomnia, so take that as you will). I heard that this was originally going to be a Stephen Spielberg movie, and it shows with having Matthew McConaughey's embodiment of American expansionism/the American dream looking to find a new planet to save the human race and his family. However, with Nolan taking the director's chair, it's easy to tell where his strengths are, like using actual science such as gravity, relativity, and how a wormhole would look like in three dimensional space) and his weaknesses are, like having a scientist explain her decisions by giving a theoretical, Dr. Manhattan-like breakdown of how love works. Compared to something like Inception (where exposition was necessary to understand how the dream world works), that love speech and the talk about why McConaughey should hold on to memories of his children makes this film feel very over explained. Especially odd since just yesterday I saw Big Hero 6, and when that movie explained it's science I got really excited about how it all worked. I even said on twitter that that movie made it's science whimsical and Interstellar's science interrupted the whimsy of exploring new planets. I actually would like to see an edit that removes most of the exposition, including most of the scientific explanation, making the film more in line with Primer and Upstream Color.