• Most new users don't bother reading our rules. Here's the one that is ignored almost immediately upon signup: DO NOT ASK FOR FANEDIT LINKS PUBLICLY. First, read the FAQ. Seriously. What you want is there. You can also send a message to the editor. If that doesn't work THEN post in the Trade & Request forum. Anywhere else and it will be deleted and an infraction will be issued.
  • If this is your first time here please read our FAQ and Rules pages. They have some useful information that will get us all off on the right foot. More details on our policies, especially our Own the Source rule are available here. If you do not understand any of these rules send a private message to one of our staff for further details.
  • Favorite Edit of the Year (FEOTY) Nominations for 2020 are now open! Submit your entries here.

A few reviews

Vultural

Well-known member
Donor
Messages
3,073
Reaction score
0
Trophy Points
41
Death Note - 2006 - 7/10

death_note_movie.jpg


Japanese winner.
I haven't had this much fun since Battle Royale, the first one.
A wonderful chess match, horror film. I say horror loosely, as it is also a thriller, a mystery and a detective show.
Light inherits the Death Note. Anyone's name written in the book will die. Light targets criminals. The best intentions lead astray.
"L" spearheads the search for Light's secret identity.
Move followed by counter-move. Wildly popular, great flick.
 

Gaith

Well-known member
Faneditor
Messages
5,449
Reaction score
34
Trophy Points
88
Vultural said:
Never Let Me Go - 2010 - 7/10

2hdbsw0.jpg


... Ruminations on whether clones possess souls.
And that's why I don't think I'll ever see the movie. What kind of a stupid-ass question is that? Why the hell shouldn't a living, functioning human be as real as any other? Were the filmmakers aware that identical twins are genetic clones of each other? Would anyone watch or humor a movie that asked if "younger" identical twins are as human as their "older" siblings? The whole concept just reeks of arthouse pretentiousness designed to earn plaudits from critics too sniffy to praise popular/groundbreaking sci-fi, but who'll happily sing about mopey uber-retro stuff like this so they can pat themselves on the back when doing year-end top ten lists and say, "see, I am open-minded, I do like science fiction when done in good taste, how very sophisticated am I, muah ha ha, pass me my sauvignon blanc." :p
 

Gatos

Well-known member
Faneditor
Messages
3,467
Reaction score
0
Trophy Points
46
Gaith said:
And that's why I don't think I'll ever see the movie. What kind of a stupid-ass question is that? Why the hell shouldn't a living, functioning human be as real as any other? Were the filmmakers aware that identical twins are genetic clones of each other? Would anyone watch or humor a movie that asked if "younger" identical twins are as human as their "older" siblings? The whole concept just reeks of arthouse pretentiousness designed to earn plaudits from critics too sniffy to praise popular/groundbreaking sci-fi, but who'll happily sing about mopey uber-retro stuff like this so they can pat themselves on the back when doing year-end top ten lists and say, "see, I am open-minded, I do like science fiction when done in good taste, how very sophisticated am I, muah ha ha, pass me my sauvignon blanc." :p

Yikes. Someone seems upset! ;-)
 

TMBTM

Well-known member
Faneditor
Messages
5,903
Reaction score
4
Trophy Points
83
Gaith said:
And that's why I don't think I'll ever see the movie. What kind of a stupid-ass question is that? Why the hell shouldn't a living, functioning human be as real as any other? Were the filmmakers aware that identical twins are genetic clones of each other? Would anyone watch or humor a movie that asked if "younger" identical twins are as human as their "older" siblings? The whole concept just reeks of arthouse pretentiousness designed to earn plaudits from critics too sniffy to praise popular/groundbreaking sci-fi, but who'll happily sing about mopey uber-retro stuff like this so they can pat themselves on the back when doing year-end top ten lists and say, "see, I am open-minded, I do like science fiction when done in good taste, how very sophisticated am I, muah ha ha, pass me my sauvignon blanc." :p

Yeah, the fact that clones would be as human as any other humans is not a question for me.
Got human DNA? Got feelings? That's enough for me: you're human.
ONE thing I'm sure about (and that some movies are so wrong about, IMO): clones never will be "the same" as the original. Because every human is different. Even identical twins, and so would clones.
That's why this movie ("Never Let Me Go") sounds silly to me. The question "Would clones possess souls?" implies that because there is an original human being, then the clone maybe can't have a soul. Why? Because it would be like a "stolen soul" or something? Different bodies, different lives, different way of thinking: a clone would be as human as you and me.

BUT... my questions are:
Should clones be made on purpose? By whom? For what? What consequencies for them being "clones made on purpose"? Would they "cost" something? Does it means someone would "own them"? Like children? Like slaves? Humans only made for medical supply? Made for preserving "the purety of a race" or a family? Could cloning a human could be considered as a racist move somehow?
Those questions all goes toward the same thing to me: it would cause more trouble than good things.
That's why I'm totaly against cloning full humans. For their own good and ours too.
Again, that does not mean I would concidered a clone like a none-human, as I said in the beginning.
 

Gaith

Well-known member
Faneditor
Messages
5,449
Reaction score
34
Trophy Points
88
Gatos said:
Yikes. Someone seems upset! ;-)
It's still a little more than a month until the next season of my competitive karaoke league. These are rough days indeed. :p


TMBTM said:
BUT... my questions are:
Should clones be made on purpose? By whom? For what? What consequencies for them being "clones made on purpose"? Would they "cost" something? Does it means someone would "own them"? Like children? Like slaves? Humans only made for medical supply? Made for preserving "the purety of a race" or a family? Could cloning a human could be considered as a racist move somehow?
I think it's pretty ridiculous to do a story in which a corporation can clone an entire person for his/her parts, but can't grow the parts without growing the person. It may be easier science-wise, but it'd be far too much hassle in practical terms, to say nothing of the political and societal difficulties.

There's a huge variety of possible stories to tell about genetic manipulation, and whether genetically enhanced/tweaked elites could some day become a sort of biological aristocracy - y'know, GATTACA-type stuff, which makes lazy crap like Never Let Me Go even more annoying. Hey, wouldn't it be just horrible if some really kids were murdered for their organs? Yes, that would be bad. Got anything else?
 

Gaith

Well-known member
Faneditor
Messages
5,449
Reaction score
34
Trophy Points
88
Hm. I think it was "pretty" or "young", though I admit the latter would be redundant.
 

Garp

Well-known member
Messages
908
Reaction score
5
Trophy Points
23
Curiosity sated. Order restored. Abundant gratitudes.
 

Vultural

Well-known member
Donor
Messages
3,073
Reaction score
0
Trophy Points
41
Cargo - 2009 - 5/10

258ry1w.jpg


Space SciFi from the Swiss.
The exhausted planet Earth has been mostly abandoned.
Folks are saving coins and heading for Rhea, a great new world.
Travel takes eight years in massive cryogenic / cargo ships.
After three years, our heroine is roused to be bulky suited, glorified patrol guard, prowling the vast emptiness of dim corridors.
Why? There is a stowaway loose, endangering lives and the ship.
Gradually, darker discoveries emerge.
Several CGI shots, luckily kept to a minimum. Unoriginal plot. Decent, post industrial “wet” sets (just curious, why doesn’t leaking water freeze in space? heating a massive vessel so that water puddles about strikes me as a colossal waste of energy. sorry).
Not a bad film, but not a good one, either. Predictable, derivative.
 

Vultural

Well-known member
Donor
Messages
3,073
Reaction score
0
Trophy Points
41
Rare Exports: A Christmas Tale - 2010 - 6/10

14o4mpy.jpg


Ho ho ho.
In Finland, US geologists / archeologists drill into something unexpected in the Korvatunturi mountains.
Animals are later found slaughtered, all the children are kidnapped.
They had accidentally unearthed the original Santa Claus, not the Coca Cola version.
The one from the locked histories, the one who devours children.
Needless to say, a dark film, set at night with difficult characters.
Not as much action or narrative thrust as I would have liked.
Enjoyable, but could have used more voltage.

Note: Most of the dialogue was in Finnish.
 

ssj

Well-known member
Donor
Faneditor
Messages
3,882
Reaction score
1
Trophy Points
51
Vultural said:
They had accidentally unearthed the original Santa Claus, not the Coca Cola version.

:lol:
 

Vultural

Well-known member
Donor
Messages
3,073
Reaction score
0
Trophy Points
41
The Devil’s Rock - 2011 - 6/10

dd1hu8.jpg


World War II, just before D-Day, two New Zealand commandos kayak to Forau, in the Channel Islands, to take out Nazi gun emplacements.
They hear female wailing and whimpering, and drop the mission to investigate.
After tiptoeing through endless corridors, they encounter blood splattered walls, gory entrails, slain German soldiers.
Naturally, they proceed. After all, some damsel needs rescuing.
Pocket thriller that, despite low budget, looks fine. Solid acting by all, as well.
Film is of two halves, however.
First part, clues lead to mystery, tension approaches dread.
Second part was stagey. Seriously, it felt like an off-Broadway or outer London play. Lot of dialogue.
Cerebral rather than gut piercing. Still, a nice little flick, especially for indie buffs.
 

Vultural

Well-known member
Donor
Messages
3,073
Reaction score
0
Trophy Points
41
The Gathering - 1977 - 7/10

2cdbqkw.jpg


Holiday gem, now forgotten.
Family sire, separated from his wife, estranged from his children, receives the 90 day expiration notice.
Wants to make amends for misplaced priorities (business over family), convinces wife to get family to come home for Christmas.
A bit mushy, but thankfully not as touchy-feelie as most Christmas fare.
Relationships between Boomers and WWII parents were extremely polarized. This film glosses over problems, and drapes a gauze of hope and over the proceedings. It is a holiday film, after all, but underlying tension is constant.
For a TV movie, this had top tier talent behind the scenes (production by Hanna-Barbera, music by John Barry), and actors who would be mainstays throughout 70s airwaves (Hill Street Blues, Mary Tyler Moore, Soap, Lou Grant, Trapper John, M*A*S*H, Remington Steele).
Bittersweet.
 

Vultural

Well-known member
Donor
Messages
3,073
Reaction score
0
Trophy Points
41
The Game - 1997 - 5/10

fyitfs.jpg


Was unimpressed by this when it originally screened. Rewatched this critical darling and I
still don’t buy the premise, no matter how polished looking, how breathless the pace.
Douglas’ character, as shown early on, would never have gotten into the situation in the first place.
One example: Would he have spent several hours in the application process? No way in hell.
The running without analyzing?
And “the game” itself? The sheer organized structure of it defies logic.
Preposterous. Though had Douglas’ character been different, the premise might have seemed more plausible.
 

Vultural

Well-known member
Donor
Messages
3,073
Reaction score
0
Trophy Points
41
Black Christmas - 1974 - 5/10

33ykevn.jpg


A decade before director Bob Clark struck holiday gold with Christmas Story ( “... You’ll shoot your eye out ...” ), he helmed this Yuletide slasher.
Olivia Hussey and Margot Kidder star in sorority house, receiving chronic obscene phone calls.
Christmas Eve, the house is invaded, and one by one ... yes, you can guess the predictable plot.
The genre had not hardened yet, so the girls I pointed out did not necessarily die, nor was the “order of victims” followed.
Very slow going proceedings, especially by todays tempo, and gore mavens will lament a lack of blood.
Keir Dullea and John Saxon male roles.
 

Vultural

Well-known member
Donor
Messages
3,073
Reaction score
0
Trophy Points
41
Snow Queen - 2002 - 6/10

Bridgetfonda.jpg


Nice Winter movie with no holiday overtones.
Bridget Fonda plays the icy Snow Queen to perfection.
The narrative involves a young girl pursuing her boyfriend who has been "taken" by the Snow Queen.
At three hours, the movie is too long, and visits to "Spring," "Summer," and "Autumn" are little more than childish comic relief.
Worth watching for Fonda and her brittle performance, but this would be better chiseled to two hours or less.
Fonda’s last performance to date.
 

Vultural

Well-known member
Donor
Messages
3,073
Reaction score
0
Trophy Points
41
Susan Slept Here - 1954 - 6/10

t82kqa.png


Film set during Christmas, but not necessarily a holiday story.
Vice cops drop off 17 year old juvenile delinquent (Debbie Reynolds) to 35 year old Hollywood writer (Dick Powell - who was 50 when this came out), and leave her in his care during Christmas.
Creepy premise for romantic comedy fluff.
I am a big fan of Mr Powell, though, and guiltily enjoyed this one.
Lush, over saturated Technicolor hues, and the overall design was packed with reds and greens, white trees, ornaments, presents in foil.
Great dream sequence, as well, with Reynolds doing a trapeze/pole dance thing inside a giant bird cage, while Powell (in sailor’s uniform), tempted by Anne Frances as ensnaring spider femme.
Powell’s last movie role.
 

Vultural

Well-known member
Donor
Messages
3,073
Reaction score
0
Trophy Points
41
Meek's Cutoff - 2010 - 6/10

Meeks.Cutoff.LIMITED.DVDRip.XviD-DoNE.avi_snapshot_00.31.28_%255B2011.08.13_17.34.30%255D.jpg


A group of pioneers heading for Oregon in 1845 hires a mountain man who knows a shortcut.
Start shaking your head now.
Of course he gets them lost. In the desert, no less. Add parched thirst, and a Paiute Indian prowling about.
The film is very slow, colors washed out, dialogue sparse. Much of the film is from the women's point of view, and the viewer, like them, cannot hear what the men are quietly discussing.
Not an action flick, but a mood piece that will try the patience of many.
 

Vultural

Well-known member
Donor
Messages
3,073
Reaction score
0
Trophy Points
41
The Blue Carbuncle - 1984 - 8/10

2ij38m.jpg


“It’s a bonny thing,” said he. “Just see how it glints and sparkles. Of course it is a nucleus and focus of crime. Every good stone is. They are the devil’s pet baits. In the larger and older jewels every facet may stand for a bloody deed ... ”
Holiday chestnut from Arthur Conan Doyle. Sinister jewel is stolen, promptly found and identified by Sherlock Holmes.
That is early in the plot, however, as Holmes and Watson proceed to backtrack the trail of the stone, unearthing the truth behind the theft.
The Victorian Christmas remains constant throughout. Bracing cold, wandering carolers, the goose.
Wonderful production values and a sense of humour fill the show.
Jeremy Brett, in this, the initial series, brims with intensity as Holmes.
 
Top Bottom