• Most new users don't bother reading our rules. Here's the one that is ignored almost immediately upon signup: DO NOT ASK FOR FANEDIT LINKS PUBLICLY. First, read the FAQ. Seriously. What you want is there. You can also send a message to the editor. If that doesn't work THEN post in the Trade & Request forum. Anywhere else and it will be deleted and an infraction will be issued.
  • If this is your first time here please read our FAQ and Rules pages. They have some useful information that will get us all off on the right foot, especially our Own the Source rule. If you do not understand any of these rules send a private message to one of our staff for further details.
  • Please read our Rules & Guidelines

Random movie thoughts

Gatos

Well-known member
Faneditor
Messages
3,467
Reaction score
1
Trophy Points
46
Gaith said:
For another thread on another board... I made a chart! :-D


TTT_zps608069c2.jpg

Ummmmm...AWESOME
 

Gatos

Well-known member
Faneditor
Messages
3,467
Reaction score
1
Trophy Points
46

ThrowgnCpr

awol
Staff member
Messages
15,090
Reaction score
36
Trophy Points
133
I haven't watched it yet, but The Oatmeal's graphic depicting the movie makes me sad:

wwz.png
 

Frantic Canadian

Well-known member
Faneditor
Messages
4,509
Reaction score
8
Trophy Points
48
ThrowgnCpr said:
I haven't watched it yet, but The Oatmeal's graphic depicting the movie makes me sad:

wwz.png

And yet another reason not to go see this.
 

DominicCobb

Well-known member
Staff member
Faneditor
Messages
2,202
Reaction score
97
Trophy Points
68
Re: World War Z

Saw it last night. Surprisingly good. Tense, exciting. Good thrills and chills. Some awesome spectacle and tight suspense. Brad Pitt's on autopilot but does a great job anyway. I'm disappointed there was nothing more to it than an action film, but if you go in knowing there won't be anything but awesome adventure, you'll be pleased with what you see. A sequel is in the works already, and I think there's some good groundwork laid down for deeper thematic material, and I really hope they go that route.

As for all the talk of the third act reshoot, if the original ending was what the Internet says it was, then the plan to redo it was a gamble that paid off in spades.
 

white43

Well-known member
Faneditor
Messages
1,725
Reaction score
1
Trophy Points
48
It's the most sterile Zombie film I've ever seen. Aside when Brad cuts his face, there's no blood whatsoever - even when Brad stomps ones head, we only see his upper body. There was some forced tension, but it had a good pace. Not sure I liked the Zombies, they were more like birds in the way they moved/acted. It wasn't good, wasn't bad, but was done better by 28 Days Later. I rather hope an uncut, gory version will come out on DVD.
 

DominicCobb

Well-known member
Staff member
Faneditor
Messages
2,202
Reaction score
97
Trophy Points
68
You see I honestly couldn't care less about gore. I realize it's a zombie movie and all, but I didn't see it to get my bloody undead carnage fix. I watch the Walking Dead, and there's more than enough blood on that show. I kind of like that it was sterile to be honest. Gave it an edge of originality oddly enough.
 

TV's Frink

You Catch On Pretty Quick
Staff member
Donor
Faneditor
Messages
23,676
Reaction score
406
Trophy Points
193
I don't get why people expected more blood and gore. It's a Brad Pitt movie!
 

Frantic Canadian

Well-known member
Faneditor
Messages
4,509
Reaction score
8
Trophy Points
48
TV's Frink said:
I don't get why people expected more blood and gore. It's a Brad Pitt movie!

Plus it's rated PG-13. Kinda tells you what to expect right there. :lol:
 

ThrowgnCpr

awol
Staff member
Messages
15,090
Reaction score
36
Trophy Points
133
I haven't seen it yet, so I am reserving judgement, but I'm disappointed by initial reviews. I don't think gore is necessary, nor did I actually expect it. However, I did expect it to be an actual adaptation of the book, which was phenomenal. It sounds like the only thing they have in common is the title, which is disappointing.
 

Gaith

Well-known member
Faneditor
Messages
5,785
Reaction score
291
Trophy Points
123
A quick and dirty edit morsel:

 

Gaith

Well-known member
Faneditor
Messages
5,785
Reaction score
291
Trophy Points
123
Insubstantial but cute:

 

ssj

Well-known member
Donor
Faneditor
Messages
3,883
Reaction score
2
Trophy Points
53
cameron crowe's almost famous: an older movie, but one of the best movies i've seen this year.
story elements that could have gone into cliched territory did not.
 

Neglify

Well-known member
Messages
13,968
Reaction score
31
Trophy Points
133
ssj said:
cameron crowe's almost famous: an older movie, but one of the best movies i've seen this year.
story elements that could have gone into cliched territory did not.

Love that movie so much. Prefer theatrical over Director's Cut, maybe one day I'll do a "Quick Fix" of it and trim down the DC.
 

ssj

Well-known member
Donor
Faneditor
Messages
3,883
Reaction score
2
Trophy Points
53
Neglify said:
Love that movie so much. Prefer theatrical over Director's Cut, maybe one day I'll do a "Quick Fix" of it and trim down the DC.

I'd watch it, bro. Mix it, DJ, mix it.
 

ssj

Well-known member
Donor
Faneditor
Messages
3,883
Reaction score
2
Trophy Points
53
raiders of the lost ark: the spike trap in the temple, in particular the trap activated by interruption of light. . . does the trap activate every night?

and the sun's angle changes throughout the year. . . some days there might not be any direct sunlight coming through.

phuck it. it's still a cool scene.
 

ssj

Well-known member
Donor
Faneditor
Messages
3,883
Reaction score
2
Trophy Points
53
In a D&D world, Indy would have a rogue in his party, or have rogue skills himself -> trap gets disarmed.

Though one could say that similar skills would allow Indy to both notice and avoid the trap--disarming optional.
 
Top Bottom