If this is your first time here please read our FAQ and Rules pages. They have some useful information that will get us all off on the right foot. More details on our policies, especially our Own the Source rule are available here. If you do not understand any of these rules send a private message to one of our staff for further details.

The Last Movie(s) You Watched... (quick one or two sentence reviews)
Kingsman; the answer to what if Deadpool and Austin Powers had a baby
[+] 2 users Like Malthus's post
Reply
(11-22-2020, 05:18 PM)Malthus Wrote: Kingsman; the answer to what if Deadpool and Austin Powers had a baby

KINGSMAN the first one -- FANTASTIC!!!

KINGSMAN 2 -- disappointing.

KINGSMAN 3 (prequel) -- fingers crosssed.

Big Grin
"... let's go exploring!" -- CALVIN.
[+] 2 users Like bionicbob's post
Reply
Horse Girl. Despite a terrific performance from Alison Brie, I found this movie to be a missed opportunity. What starts as a quirky comedy moves into a serious examination of mental health. Unfortunately the movie doesn’t pivot successfully and it ends up feeling like it trivializes the issues.
[+] 1 user Likes Moe_Syzlak's post
Reply
I watched New Mutants last night. Not the best X-Men movie but far from the worst. I would have liked to have seen them actually use their Mutant names, and I would have liked to have seen Sam/Cannonball use his powers in the final fight (or did I just miss it?). I also think Illyana/Magik's powers could have been a bit better explained on-screen. Otherwise I thought it was perfectly fine, if not amazing. Pairing them up with McAvoy's Xavier in the next movie to take on Essex Corp/Mister Sinister would have been fun, but we'll never see it now.
[+] 1 user Likes asterixsmeagol's post
Reply
I "watched" these while I was doing other work during the week.

Clear and Present Danger (1994)
One of my favorite political thrillers. Harrison Ford is the quintessential Jack Ryan. The cast is perfect. The acting is great. It doesn't pretend to be anything more than what it is, but what it is is a fantastic film. 10/10

Jack Ryan: Shadow Recruit (2014)
I like Chris Pine and think he could have been a great ongoing Jack Ryan, but alas this movie is lack luster and struggles to take cold war era stories and bring them into current day. Branagh plays a convincing creep of a baddie here, but ultimately characters aren't really given any development throughout. The hallmark of C&PD and THfRO are that they didn't try to be action flicks. They were great movies that had some elements as a result of the story they told. This one tried too hard to be Bourne and ended up being a run of the mill action espionage movie without much soul. 6.5/10

The Sum of All Fears (2002)
I found myself not even glancing much at the tv while this one was on, unless Morgan Freeman was on screen. The movie became noise for the background, and not much at that. I'm not an Affleck fan and this movie reiterated that for me. Morgan Freeman is great as always, but even he couldn't help me like this Jack Ryan outing. 4/10

The Hunt for Red October (1990)
Iconic. Without this one we wouldn't have any of the others. The format and presentation of this film influenced many others. James Earl Jones is great and shows why he stuck around for 3 films. Baldwin's portrayal of Jack Ryan is a little too confident and uppity for my personal taste. That's not to say that he didn't do a good job, he's just not my preferred Jack Ryan. I always find it funny how Connery has that thick Scottish accent and is a born and raised Russian commander. Sam Neill, Tim Curry, all the cast are on their A games here and do a fantastic job. This 30 year old film is far more engaging than the mindless action flicks of today and attempts to ground itself in reality to create its suspense. 8/10

Jack Ryan rated from favorite to least favorite:
Harrison Ford: It's Harrison Ford. He's confident, but not cocky. He's flawed, but has integrity. He's unsure, but resolute.
John Krasinski: His portrayal is similar to Ford's, but in an updated present day way. While I don't so much care for the series he is in, he's the 2nd best Jack Ryan in my book.
Alec Baldwin/Chris Pine: These two are on par for me. I prefer watching Pine more than Baldwin, but Baldwin is more Jack Ryan in my mind than Pine's rendition.



oh yeah, Ben Affleck played Jack Ryan....his character in what we get here is basically the same as any other role he's played. Yes, Ford and Pine are similar in this regard, but I feel like I'm watching Affleck act whereas I'm watching Ford and Pine portray their interpretation of a character. I always feel Affleck roles are characters as Affleck when it should be the other way around.
[+] 1 user Likes DigModiFicaTion's post
Reply
(11-18-2020, 12:35 AM)DigModiFicaTion Wrote: The Amazing Spider-Man (2012)
I still didn't care for this movie, but I realized this time that it wasn't made for my generation. I grew up with the Tobey Maguire Spidey and he still remains the purest Spidey of the live actions, imho. This movie was ok and I found myself realizing that Andrew Garfield was actually probably a better in costume Spidey in terms of fitting the iconic look of Spider-Man from the comics. I get why they would want to move quickly through the origin story as we've all seen it before, but I wish they would have just dropped us into a story and then worked more on the characters and how they relate to each other. For example, Flash goes from Peter's bully to best friend without any explanation. The CGI was eh...The story was eh...Definitely not the best, but not the worst super hero movie I've seen. 5.75/10

The Amazing Spider-Man 2 (2014)
The music in this was SO distracting. I love Hans Zimmer and Mike Einziger, but this was just too much bombastic synthy superman ripoff techno crunch for me. I also felt the Phillips Phillips song was a little on the nose and tv sitcom-ish. Characters here are hollow and connections to Harry are unexplained and ultimately lacking. Everything happens too quickly and Gwen and Peter are magically back together at the beginning after being split at the end of the first outing...Oh and even Spidey couldn't have survived all of that current. Speaking of, Jamie Foxx's talent was grosely misused here and he was reduced to a side note....in fact there isn't even a real main bad guy in this movie. The main antagonist seems to be the relationship between Peter and Gwen. This movie was like a slimfast shake trying to pretend it was a 1950's malt shake. Chalky and synthetic. 4.5/10

You sir, are wrong Tongue Gaith already responded well about your thoughts on ASM1, and my upcoming ASM2 defense video will respond to your thoughts on that one Big Grin Amazing Spider-Man 2 is sooo misunderstood and underrated
Reply
(11-18-2020, 03:35 PM)Gaith Wrote: Again, I gotta disagree, especially when compared to Spider-Man '02. Anyone is of course perfectly entitled to prefer the various characterizations of that movie, but, if one were counting screen time and distinct character beats, I think one would find that ASM1's Ben, May, and Gwen all get objectively more development than SM1's Ben, May, and MJ. (Connors and Norman Osborn probably get similar amounts of development, and I'll freely admit Connors' characterization lifts a lot from SM2's Doc Ock.) And, I think the Peter-Gwen relationship is far more built up and credible than Maguire and Dunst making drippy faces at each other, particularly since ASM1's Peter doesn't gaslight his crush by maintaining his double identity. Tongue

(And, again, I gotta ask: why are Peter and Harry such close friends in SM1, such that they share an apartment? What do a rich lout who's flunked out of several private schools and a painfully shy nerd have in common? IIRC, the movie cheats by having them start out as best friends, albeit for no discernible reason.)

Though I mostly agree with you Gaith I gotta say SM1 has great characterizations for both MJ and Harry. Gwen blows them out of the water, sure, but MJ and Harry in SM1 (and Harry in ASM2) certainly deserve more credit. Especially in comparison to Ned and Michelle. Bleh. I think HiTop Films put it very well in his Raimi vid as well.
Reply
Vivarium (2019)
What I like best about this film is that you don't spend half the movie screaming at the leads to do the obvious thing. They don't even scale up gradually, they pretty much directly deal with the conundrum they're in the most dramatic way possible right at the start. The downside is that the film then goes in a direction which was less interesting to me. Spoilerific thoughts here.

You Were Never Really Here (2017)
This might be the film that disappointed me the most this year. Finally got a chance to watch it, and it's about 70% Phoenix moping around looking traumatized. Props to director Lynn Ramsey for realizing he was her greatest asset and spending all that energy filming him from artistic angles, but I wanted more story to this. Recommend Joker instead.
Webmaster for www.nottheacademy.com, Movie Articles, Lists, and Reviews...Come join us!
[+] 1 user Likes mnkykungfu's post
Reply
I have to agree with DigModiFicaTion's assessment of the Tom Clancy films. I'm a long time fan of the books, and for me Harrison Ford is the quintessential Jack Ryan. He nailed how I imagined the character reading the books. Affleck is a total miss. I also think Krasinski is a good follow-on to Ford's portrayal. I actually am enjoying the series; IMHO it's done a good job of taking the '80's cold war setting and moving to the modern day.

Now on to my own recent watches.
The Irishman A long movie, but it's worth the view. I enjoyed it even though I had to watch in bits and pieces after the kids all went to bed. I expect the fanedit breaking it up into four episode will work well.

Jingle Jangle This is a fun musical. It's nice that it's not trying to simply retread an existing movie. It's holiday-ish, centered on a toy maker/inventor generally in winter, but no overt Christmas references.
[+] 2 users Like Racerx1969's post
Reply
Spy Game (2001)
This movie is great. Redford and Pitt are fantastic together and the internal espionage mirrors the more traditional field espionage incredibly well. They don't make movies like this anymore. It's right up there with Clear and Present Danger. A film that stays grounded in reality and doesn't seek to go over the top. This is a story driven film that doesn't depend on gotcha moments, but instead focuses on developing characters through a narrative that highlights some of the ethical and moral dilemmas of espionage. Muir and Bishop's characters are almost like looking glasses into each other's future and past which allows the story to have a duality of depth that is also singularly connected. If you like Redford & Pitt and enjoy story driven espionage movies, you'll probably like Spy Game. 9/10
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)